Hi
Anyone using Upstream bundling on Cisco MC20x20 cable card.
Could you share your opinion about stability & performance
and if possible some uBR10K config
Hi
Anyone using Upstream bundling on Cisco MC20x20 cable card.
Could you share your opinion about stability & performance
and if possible some uBR10K config
Hi there and hello to
Hi there and hello to everyone, i resently have a cisco MC20x20 but its still in tests and i hope not be reckeless, anyone have a document for configure this hardware iam beginner in this topic of Docsis barely handle Docsis 1.1 but with this channel nonding and frequency stacking i get lost so if you can help tou very welcome by the way for mi raw english an apologize. Regards.
(No subject)
Sorry, takes time
Sorry, takes time :)
Following a short configuration:
Here also some output from the bonded cable modem (4DS 2US):
Tests for performance and stability is on going :)
regards,
wittmann
P.S. Sorry for my poor english ;)
card
Hey Peter,
Have you borrowed the mc20x20 from Cisco since you have tested it for them ?
Martin
DK
Hi Martin, we got a loan for
Hi Martin,
we got a loan for 2x one week last year. The linecard was on "Road-Show" at few MSO in Europe. We have made some test, if our concept is supported by the restrictions of the linecard aso.
Now we have some 2020 in stock and we have much more time to finish our internal ATP.
The problem is, with the new linecard a new IOS-Release is mandatory (IOS Version 12.2(33)SCC). And every new IOS must be tested.
regards,
wittmann
P.S. Sorry for my poor english ;)
Hey, Your talking about
Hey,
Your talking about restrictions ? what kind of restrictions ?
Yes, it needs new IOS and yes it probably has lots of bugs :/
Martin
DK
Restrictions like... ...only
Restrictions like...
...only up to 8 upstreams per MAC Domain / Cable Interface
...you canot share unused Integrated-Controller with an other 2020 in different Slot (to allocate the downstream to an other MAC Domain at different linecars). Cisco has a workaround for this bevavior: They make it possible to create a bonding-group accross MAC-Domains but for my personaly opinion this is against the spec.
Btw. the CMTS design at Cisco is "quite" old in compare with other vendors like Arris, Motorola or Casa. These vendors has already different types of linecards: upstream and downstream are on different linecards and you can create a own MAC Domain ratio not based on the linecard itself.
regards,
wittmann
P.S. Sorry for my poor english ;)
Mac Domain crossing more than one cable cards
Could you write something more about Cisco workaround for share Downstream from different Cards ?
You wrote that is possible to create a bonding-group accross MAC-Domains ?
It can only be the backplain
It can only be the backplain restrictions of the old 10k chassie thats setting the limit of not sharing bw between linecards.
The traffic is probably passing through the PRE :/ But i dont understand the limit of 8 US pr mac-domain,
must be an design issue so users are upgrading to mc3g60.
Martin
DK
config
Hey Wittmann,
Many thanks for the config, VERY nice work, i must say. Great comments also!
In this setup do you mix 2.0 and 3.0 modems together ? if yes, how it this done ? and what about LB on the 2.0 modems vs. 3.0
Martin
DK
Right! In this setup
Right! In this setup mixed-mode is available between 1.x, 2.0 and 3.0 CMs. Upstream 2 is in mixed-mode and 3,2MHz BW to be downward capable.
Overview of the Load-Balancing in static counter based mode:
Upstream2: 3,2MHz 16QAM (10,24Mbit/s)
Upstream3: 6,4MHz 16QAM (20,48Mbit/s)
If you have no upstream bonding between u2 and u3, then 33% are on upstream2 and 66% on upstream3 from the cable modems (2.0, 3.0)
If you want to have the 3.0 CMs only on upstream3 you can use Required Attribute-Mask on upstream3 and configfile on the 3.0 CM.
regards,
wittmann
P.S. Sorry for my poor english ;)
Wittmann, You know how its
Wittmann,
You know how its done in DBS ? is the traffic load shared based on flows, tcp/udp sessions ? or even better, done at a lower level ?
Martin
DK
Hey Peter, Thanks for the
Hey Peter,
Thanks for the info. What your saying is that you dont need the old LB setup any more if you do US bonding on all your USs (2.0 and 3.0).
Very nice, if so, much more kiss ;-)
Martin
DK
Found an nice slide from
Found an nice slide from cablelabs describing it nicely:
http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~jmarty/projects/docsis/GregWhite-ChannelBondi...
Peter, you know of any limits of US bonding on mc5x20 because of CPU ?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/cable/configuration/guide/ubr_uscb.h...
"Aggregated rate limiting—This is based on Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus aggregated throughput. The throughput is per line card for all bonded service flows. You can modify the default throughput and burst rate configuration. The maximum allowed throughput is 115 Mbps. "
If this is true, i hope not, thats not a lot of traffic ;-/
Martin
DK
CM configs
How are you guys optimizing your CM config files for US bonding ?
Using identical CM config files with 1 or 2 Upstreams yields the exactly same performance with both Netgear CVD31T and SA EPC3925 - I assume this will be the case for all US-bonding capable modems..
I noticed there's no additional US Sfid/flow created for US bonded modem so I'm thinking maybe the configured MaxBurst setting will only allow the modem to transmit the same amount of data no matter how many upstreams are bonded - does that make sense ?
/Uffe - Denmark
Hello Martin, yes i know
Hello Martin,
yes i know from the "bottleneck" of the upload speed with the MC5x20 Linecards. A guy from an other MSO told us this issue a few months ago.
For us, this is no problem because our offer in field need no upstream bonding.
btw: the links are not complete
regards,
wittmann
P.S. Sorry for my poor english ;)
Hey Peter, Strange that the
Hey Peter,
Strange that the CPU om mc5x20 card is so small that it can only handle 115mbit bonding US-traffic, thats not a lot.
Think i have to ask Cisco about this, people are loosing tons of avab. bw on this account (E-Docsis - 30.72x20 = ~600mbit),
that cant be true.
URL:
http://www-china.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/cable/configuration/
guide/ubr_uscb_ps2209_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html
Martin
DK
tdma-atdma
Just a quick question... On your config I see when your using mixed mode why do you use upstream equalization??? I thought that was a bad thing until pure 64-Qam...
Dude